|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Kroot Warrior
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Swindon, England
Posts: 10
|
I had a game earlier this week against a friend of mine who plays marines a number of items I was using seemed to be rather overly effective so I just wanted to find out- in the spirit of fairness- if I was playing them correctly.
1)Markerlights: After a number of his power armoured minions went up in a plume of seeker missile induced death, he posed a rather interesting question, "do you get a cover save from markerlight hits." After seeing how animated he was getting (refering to the pathfinders as "cheats") I decided to play the rest of the game allowing him the cover save was this correct? 2)SMS: I know I'm right on this one but thought I'd put it here anyway, can you be facing completely the wrong way and around the corner from the target and still hit them? 3) Disruption Pods: It says that the vehicle counts as an obscured target so does this mean they would get a 4+ cover save from anything over 12" away? 4) Do kroot really get a 3+ cover save in woods now? Any help/clarrification on these would be of great help to smoothing things over with my friend! (he doesn't lose well!) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() |
2,3 and 4: Yes.
1: Depends, its coming from the vehicle, but its normal shooting so yes cover there. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Saal
![]() Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Ohio thats in the USA
Posts: 144
|
He would get a cover save from the missile not the marker light. armor invulnerable and cover saves only stop wounds. At least this is how I read the save rules.
__________________
Eat recycled food its good for the environment and ok for you too. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Markerlights themselves don't grant cover saves because they don't wound. So no, they're not "cheats", and Mr. Marine player has no right to get pissy.
__________________
![]() Warhams is serious business. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
|
About the SMS, where exactly does the Codex say that it does not use the usual vehicle firing arc, please? Does it also mean that I am not limited by the usual 45 degrees elevation limit?
That could help me a lot. During a tournament my Fish got immobilized facing a bad direction. It became useless for the rest of the game. If I could have used the SMS, I would have shot 4 shots a turn on the opponent. |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think it still uses the same firing arc, it just doesn't need LOS. I don't believe it specifically says in the codex that it does, but it's still mounted in a cupola.
__________________
![]() Warhams is serious business. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
|
That is how I understand it.
The SMS is hull mounted, therefore it has the usual firing arc, however it does not need LOS. So no, you can not be facing "completely the wrong way" as Ksimyen Jud said. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
That is one of the strength of the markerlight, there is no save for it. SMS are not affected by terrain or facing really...it's a undebelly 360 turret afterall.
__________________
For the Greater Good! For Ksi'm'yen and the 76th Moracre Light Armoured Guard I Invite you to join my collective story and to add to it. My ascension to GODHOOD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |||||
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You've gotten a lot of answers but if you'll allow me I'll give you some details on all of the answers.
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Honestly your marine friend shouldn't really complain. All of the bonuses that our army got in 5th edition were offset by the loss of some key abilities from 4th edition that were all in all were pretty crippling. Similarly, the space marines have a brand new codex with all sorts of insane new abilities and special characters. Some of their more ridiculous stuff got nerfed but they've still got a few insanely good special characters and abilities. He should just learn how to play his army a little better really. In any case, it's good to see new Tau players with such a keen grasp on the rules. Welcome to the greater good! ;D |
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,814
|
I think you switched editions on us Jedi.
![]() Writing the edition with the save in mind probably is what did it. I think "ahead" sometimes as well.
__________________
![]() Seventh Sanctum signature oddities. Alignment: Neutral Pessimistic Area of Magical Study: Practical Chronomancy Favorite Spells: Divine Spell of the Cotton Candy Golem and Field of Bacon. Proud supporter of Joe Wood! Makes this your one good deed a day. ![]() http://www.thehungersite.com/ |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Rule clarifications | BobTD | Warmachine | 0 | 08 Sep 2009 03:19 |
| Need some help with orks/rule clarifications | Oores | Tau | 10 | 30 Mar 2009 04:19 |
| rule clarifications on broadsides and crisis suits firing all weapons. | fiercegoldfish | Tau | 7 | 08 Aug 2008 00:11 |
| some rule clarifications | Commando O | Tau | 15 | 10 Aug 2005 04:04 |
| MERGED: a few rule clarifications | RJay | Tau | 0 | 11 Feb 2005 08:12 |