|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Saal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
|
if a HQ unit takes gun drones does he loose his independent character statice? i have looked though the codex and the core rule book and i cant find any reason they would count as retinues.
i had a guy that looked 35 and still lived with his mother accuse me of trying to bend the rules in my favor, saying that the drone on my shas'el made him loose the independent character statice and would not allow him to be attached to the crisis suit team he happened to be deployed with.note that the crisis suits where a separate team and not bodyguards. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Katy, Texas
Posts: 627
|
Yes they do make him lose his IC status. I don't have the book on me right now but I belive it is in the Wargear section.
__________________
ARMY STATS: Tau: 24 Wins - 4 Ties - 2 Loss I'm right behind you! Never look back at what you have done. If you do you might not see the tree in front of you. |
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Saal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
|
i looked there, and it never says that he looses it or that they count as retinues. i dont see why they would as every leader in any squad can take drones.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,807
|
It's in the army list entry for the Shas'O/Shas'El - it states specifically that if he takes gun drones, he and the drones form a unit... 'nuff said, I should think. About squad leaders, it's irrelivant - you can't loose IC status if you never had it...
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Saal
![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 167
|
true but it also says that he mey still join another unit which does not mean they are a retinue. the big argument is that newer published books override the older works, seance the 4th end. book came out after the tau codex the core rule book should override it making him loose the IC statice, but it never says that there a retinue... no reading between the lines.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually I think codex rules take precedence unless it's specifically stated otherwise, like the issue with drones and mixed armor/majority toughness stated in the FAQ.
I don't think it's stated anywhere which books take precedence, except that it's obvious in the case of two codices for the same army. I could be wrong but I don't remember anyone on record about how codices and new rulebooks interact. Still, I think it's intended that he loses his IC status. If it's important enough to state it in the codex, it probably represents the designers considering it significant enough... just because it's not specifically designated as a retinue seems kind of meaningless to me. Would you ever call robotic flying gun platforms, controlled by the character, a retinue? It seems more like equipment to me, but equipment that changes the unit enough so that, for balance terms, the designers wanted it to remove IC status. |
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,807
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Saal
![]() Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Posts: 122
|
Not to be too argumentative, but are the drones in this case not considered wargear? I don't remember wargear removing IC status. Could be wrong though :
__________________
Build a man a fire and he will be warm for a night. Set a man on fire and he will be warm for the rest of his life. |
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Auin'Myrrath is completely correct in this. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sandy Eggo
Posts: 1,954
|
I can answer that in a very solid way (solid in that the Codex spells this very thing out):
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
Though I walk through the valley of the swarms of the clueless, I shall fear no idiocy, for the M-STAR flagged them 12 seconds ago, and the JDAMS are already freefalling. |
||
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Drone question | Lupus | Tau | 2 | 21 Jan 2008 18:42 |
| Drone question | Nox | Tau | 39 | 13 Jan 2008 00:19 |
| Marker Drone Question | Sightline | Tau | 5 | 18 Apr 2006 06:27 |
| Drone question | Piranha Pilot | Tau | 13 | 16 Apr 2006 15:10 |
| Another Drone Question | striker | Tau | 10 | 26 Nov 2004 00:02 |