Tau Empire Codex 2013 | Army Builder Program
Dark Angels Codex 2013
Chaos Daemons Codex 2013
Chaos Space Marines Codex 2012

Warhammer 40k Forum Tau Online

 

Warhammer 40K Forum

Mystic Question!
Reply
Old 25 May 2010, 00:16   #41 (permalink)
Ethereal
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 18,087
Default Re: Mystic Question!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan
I am slightly bewildered that you guys had to get RAW on the troops in vehicles scoring though. That was one of the big changes from 5th everyone talked about. That's not saying much though since I forgot about it in this context as well. ;D
I understand how it works. But since you were using it as an example, I wanted the exact wording. It tells you to measure from the hull outright. There would still be no need for page 66.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan
I don't feel entirely unjustified in asking for a bit more concrete RAW.
That is fair. But if anything, it is just an example of GW not pointing out changes very clearly.
khanaris is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 May 2010, 00:30   #42 (permalink)
Shas'O
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 9,814
Default Re: Mystic Question!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Khanaris
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan
I am slightly bewildered that you guys had to get RAW on the troops in vehicles scoring though. That was one of the big changes from 5th everyone talked about. That's not saying much though since I forgot about it in this context as well. ;D
I understand how it works. But since you were using it as an example, I wanted the exact wording. It tells you to measure from the hull outright. There would still be no need for page 66.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dexter Morgan
I don't feel entirely unjustified in asking for a bit more concrete RAW.
That is fair. But if anything, it is just an example of GW not pointing out changes very clearly.
I was actually talking to Chico, I truly don't understand most of that post of his. :P
[hr]

As for your first point, it's still a point that I was able to find that was more current than something connected to 4th. I'd imagine it's just said again to stress that a vehicle could contest as well and how to measure for that (any point on the hull) etc. In any case, I think it's not quite as clear as everyone makes it seem to be. Then again, this may just be a rule that will go the way of the aforementioned pinning weapons (everyone truly does ignore it because it doesn't make sense by RAI), which I'm okay with as well if it ends up like that.

__________________


Seventh Sanctum signature oddities.
Alignment: Neutral Pessimistic
Area of Magical Study: Practical Chronomancy
Favorite Spells: Divine Spell of the Cotton Candy Golem and Field of Bacon.

Proud supporter of Joe Wood!

Makes this your one good deed a day.
http://www.thehungersite.com/
enderwiggin is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mawlock/ Mystic Question? chicop76 General 40K 16 06 May 2010 08:43
Mystic and Drop Pod Question Saint The Inquisition 8 28 Aug 2009 18:44
Regarding Inquisitorial Henchmen - The Mystic MDRedeemer The Inquisition 8 15 Dec 2008 14:39
tzeentch Lord Question and Daemone weapon question. majonga Forces of Chaos 2 12 Apr 2008 01:32