|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Shas'La
![]() ![]() |
ok im half way though a game atm and a tau player is wanting to shoot over his firer warriors with his crisis suit.
now i though units could shoot over other units, but we cant find the rule, and by the tau players logic if there are caps in squads then your free to shoot many squads though your other squads. Can you fire over/though your own squad just because the model(not a tank of monstrous creature) is higher then the other or have a line of sight though gaps in the front squad |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
|
You can shoot through any number of squads. The squad which the firing model belongs to does not count, but any other models in the way give 4+ cover save to the target.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,830
|
i havnt pushed this but i thought it was olny if you couldnt draw line of sight through the other squad (like you have one squad of marines on a hill, another on a plain, and they are shooting at an ork squad on a hill, i though that there were no cover saves in that case)
__________________
Kansas city club at frostreaver.com ![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,958
|
Quote:
Let's see if I can do some ASCII art here... X XXXXX X X Y Z X X Y Z X X Y Z OK. You'll have to imagine your own lines of sight, but big guy X can "see" over the head of little guy Y, so unit Z does not get a cover save. From the point of view of unit Z, big guy X is half obscured by little guy Y, so X does get a cover save. If unit Z was much closer, then the head of little guy Y would be in the way and Z would get a cover save against fire from the big guy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,074
|
Quote:
"If models fires through the gaps between some elements of area terrain... ... or through the gaps between models in an intervening unit, the target is in cover, even if it is completely visible to the firer." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,830
|
thats what i thought knightperson, so i could put some fire warriors infront of broadsides and still shoot normally
__________________
Kansas city club at frostreaver.com ![]() Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'La
![]() ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 397
|
Quote:
Otherwise gretchin would be completely useless for screening orks. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 500
|
The section on p21 about Intervening Models is, I believe, what you are looking for.
He can, indeed, shoot through a friendly unit, and the target will get the 4+ cover save. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) | |
|
Shas'Vre
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,958
|
Quote:
@DarthIbis: As long as they are drawing line of sight over the top of the unit rather than through gaps in between models then p21 does not apply and no cover save is granted. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) |
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
reluctantly I must admit knight person is right.
However in doing so you put your men at risk of blast weapons. Such as... Plas-cans of which my army has numerous amounts of ![]() Hmmm nice tactic by the way.
__________________
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Question about shooting | medd | General 40K | 6 | 11 Sep 2009 22:02 |
| Shooting question | Maneki_Neko | General 40K | 4 | 18 Aug 2009 04:22 |
| Question about Shooting and Assault | Redhaven | General 40K | 13 | 18 May 2008 21:33 |
| Question on Skimmers and Shooting? | Hyena031 | General 40K | 3 | 08 Aug 2007 22:31 |
| Shooting Through Squads? | the emperors flame | General 40K | 6 | 06 Feb 2007 03:57 |