Tau Empire Codex 2013 | Army Builder Program
Dark Angels Codex 2013
Chaos Daemons Codex 2013
Chaos Space Marines Codex 2012

Warhammer 40k Forum Tau Online


Warhammer 40K Forum

Horizontal vs. Direct Measurement
Old 28 Sep 2008, 04:22   #1 (permalink)
Kroot Shaper
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Ummmmm...
Posts: 45
Default Horizontal vs. Direct Measurement

First of all, I am terribly sorry if this question is answered clearly in the 5th edition rulebook, as I have said before, I still do not have my own copy, and I really need to fix that. :P

Now, with that out of the way, how exactly should measurements be made when playing 40k?

Should they be made horizontally, over the battlefield, without taking height differences into account (unless specified by the rules)?
This seems to be the way things were done in 4th edition, at least with movement. The book says that a model may move up and down the same distance it moves along when taking a difficult terrain test. But that means if you roll a six, the model could actually end up... *frantic calculations* 8.5 inches from where it started!

Or, should measurements be made directly from the starting point to the end point, including any height difference between the points?
For example, a unit of firewarriors with pulse rifles could not shoot at another unit elevated 36" in a tower 2" away, and the model above could only move 6 inches up at a 45 degree angle, about 4.2" horizontally and another 4.2" vertically.

Actually, does it even matter that much, as long as all measurements are made consistently?

Any help would be appreciated, as this is kind of starting to give me a headache.
The Enrichment Center reminds you that the weighted companion cube will never threaten to stab you, and in fact, cannot speak.

(\_/) this is bunny
(0.o) please copy and paste this into your sig and
'(__)' help him achieve world domination

Hoi, hoi, u embleer hrair
m'saion ule hraka vair
woogmeister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 Sep 2008, 04:35   #2 (permalink)
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 1,750
Default Re: Horizontal vs. Direct Measurement

I use a 6 inch string to do movement around corners and heights.
The string would only go horizontally and vertically, not in a direct line to the end. Most models can't jump that far.

/ |
4.47 inch / |4 inch
/ |
/ |
start /___|
2 inch
Korill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28 Sep 2008, 04:39   #3 (permalink)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 18,087
Default Re: Horizontal vs. Direct Measurement

Buy a rulebook, or look at your opponent's. You can't play the game without the rules, and we can't replace the book.

But this is different in 5th Edition. Weapon ranges are measured at the required angle. And moving up and down between levels in a building costs 3". For other sorts of climbing, it is really left up to you and your opponent to negotiate.
khanaris is offline   Reply With Quote


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Direct Fire The Man They Call Jayne Imperial Guard 3 24 Jul 2009 14:54
Measurement? Scoutninja 40K Universe 9 31 Jul 2008 20:31
I just got Direct TV... GeekyGator Enclave Talk 11 01 Jul 2008 18:37