|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Kroot Shaper
|
I was shocked with the fact that GW got rid of all the different daemons and just put these basic things that will maybe get one kill in before they die. I was told that there was going to be a daemons codex coming out. Or we could just use the rules from the old codex. Care to shed some light?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
|
Quote:
Also the 'New Codex' is rumored to come out in the spring. Also, no you cannot use the old codex's stats.
__________________
Necron Battle Challenge Blog, Check it out! Diplomacy Game thread Quote:
~Friedrich Nietzsche |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | ||||
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 850
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |||
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: May 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 2,692
|
Quote:
__________________
Necron Battle Challenge Blog, Check it out! Diplomacy Game thread Quote:
~Friedrich Nietzsche |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) | ||||
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 850
|
Quote:
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Your right about doing what you want, it's your battle. But there is a limit, there are rules. Every new Codex overrides the old one, it's simple. If everyone could pick and choose from multiple old codex's our game would be a wreck and not worth playing, plus GW wouldn't even bother releasing new codex's. The old Daemons sucked because people only took Bloodletters or Daemonette's! The summoning rules were just confusing and pointless, and instability was just such a complicated rule that most people generally "forgot" about it. With the new Codex no God specific Daemon is left out, all are included in one easy to use unit. Summoning is easier and more effective, instability is gone, and so is God favouritism. If GW had kept the old daemons, people would still only use Bloodletters and Daemonette's, at least with the new codex every daemon gets used without being hounded by pointless rules. What you do in your gaming community is non of my business, but remember that your behaviour reflects on the next generation of gamers, and thus the cruel circle of plucking anything out of anywhere is born. Why do you think we have so many powergamers and rules lawyers infesting the game?
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Shas'La
![]() ![]() Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: York, England
Posts: 353
|
The only thing i like about the new lesser daemons is the fact that instability is gone and replaced with fearless (nice and simple). The old daemons were FAR better and more fluffy! I play death guard, and i would far prefer to pay a few extra points and have +1 T, Nurgles rot and always wound on a 4+ (or better dependant on str). I was gutted when i found out that i lost my plague bearers and DEVISTATED that i couldn't field my beloved nurglings any more. You have just got to love the little pussbags! :'(
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |||
|
Shas'Ui
![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Dublin
Posts: 850
|
@Anton: There is much truth in what you say. But look at it this way: I have daemonettes, mounted daemonettes and furies. Now, with the new rules they would all be exactly the same, which - let's face that - would be just plain stupid.
I'm not keeping to the old rules for power, only for fluff. A daemonette is a bloody daemonette, it's not a bloodletter nor a screamer, period. I am willing to put at risk the wellbeing of the Warhammer community of the entire world in order to ensure that my game is not absurd. On a more positive note, this is a temporary solution. When the codex for daemons comes out, I will play my daemonettes as they are represented if that codex, even if they're total crap. Also please note that it's not because they are daemonettes which are supposed to be so good. If I was playing a Nurgle army, I would use Nurglite daemons (which are probably my favourite ones, BTW - nurglings are marvellous units).
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Shas'La
![]() ![]() Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 483
|
What about if you could give the new daemons (and greater damons I suppose) the new marks (+1I,+1T,+1A and +1Ivn) for an approraite cost for each model, would they seem more atrative for 'fluff'* players?
Myself and the guy at my store both agree that this would be a good solution for chaos players and thier daemons, although mounted daemonettes, nurglings, flesh hounds, screamers and flamers all suffer the 'lumped together into one' sindrom, atleast their would be a small option for customisiation. * Some people claim to build a fluffy army, or take a fluffy unit, only to gain an adavantage of said unit, and make a cheesy army, all in the name of fluff, not saying anyone here does that, I have just noticed it, is all |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Ethereal
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The new daemons are a joke...
"Look at my bloodthirster! He has massive wings!" "Can't fly though : "
__________________
[quote]Thou shalt not crave thy neighbour Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Codex: Daemons - Redux | Wargamer | House Rules | 24 | 20 May 2008 14:14 |
| 1500 new Daemons codex, no gods. | Bladesuit | Chaos Army Lists | 2 | 14 May 2008 18:45 |
| Codex: Daemons released today! | Commander Songblade | Forces of Chaos | 22 | 14 May 2008 02:10 |
| Codex Daemons: Too fantasy for 40k? | Circus Freak | Forces of Chaos | 33 | 12 May 2008 13:34 |
| New release: Codex Daemons | That Phyco Guy | Games Workshop News and Rumours | 28 | 25 Mar 2008 10:34 |