|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,807
|
Well, the BFG rulebook gives us only the following:
"It fires a projectile at icredible velocity, using graviometric impellers to accelerate it to close to lightspeed. The projectile implodes at a preset distance after firing, unleahing a force more potent than a dozen plasma bombs." I can't find anything on Wiki or Google, and a friend and I were debating their mechanism and firepower. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | ||
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Brampton Ont. Canada
Posts: 6,441
|
Well its gotta be pretty darn powerful. I'm not sure if GW has ever really explained the effect of being in a nova cannon blast in detail. Of course I'm probably no where near up to date on my BFG knowledge (please dont hurt me)
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Nashville
Posts: 2,891
|
I think the projectile works like bombs today work. The shot is fire useing the gravic what-evers sending the cannon shell fly really fast to say the least, then, like bombs, it explodes before contact to create a larger blast radius and larger area of effect. And when you factor in the high speed it gives it a whole new set of kenetic energy to be used against the target.
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) | |
|
Ethereal
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I very much doubt this is a conventional bomb. If Gothic-scale is correct, it has a detonation radius measured in thousands of kilometres. This thing could take out Texas in one shell.
It also sounds remarkably like a highly-advanced Railgun to me...
__________________
Farewell, Kangaroo Joe, you shall not be forgotten. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Shas'El
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
what are graviometric impellers? never heard of that before
__________________
http://world2.monstersgame.co.uk/?ac=vid&vid=31118495 go to the above to help me on a browser game Download my codex! http://www.box.net/public/d6c1ki0iah Click on the .pub file and hit Save to Disk.
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) | |
|
Ethereal
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is just theory, you understand...
I believe the graviometric impeller works by creating a massive density-spike, presumably via some form of electromagnetic techno-sorcery, infront of the projectile. This would cause the shell to be "pulled" towards the end of the barrel. At the same time, a null-point behind the projectile creates a repelling-effect. These dual-anomalies are moved along the barrel, pushing/pulling the shell with them, and accellerating it to mind-numbing speeds. What is difficult to explain is the tremendous recoil these guns are reported to have...
__________________
Farewell, Kangaroo Joe, you shall not be forgotten. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,807
|
Well, regardless of the mode of propulsion the barrel is roughly the size of a small escort... reason enough there for recoil, I'd think.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) | |
|
Ethereal
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Not really... Railguns (if that's what this is) have a recoil that is perpendicular to the barrel... so the recoil would be up/down/sideways, not backward.
__________________
Farewell, Kangaroo Joe, you shall not be forgotten. Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Shas'O
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,807
|
Truesay... Gothic mentions that the weapons are prow-mounted so the engines can compensate for the 'recoil'. Two possible solutions I see are:
1) GW is technobabbling without any attention to realism (as usual). 2) Nova Cannon tend to be anchored directly below the armoured prow of the ship - perhaps that lovely 6+ battering ram is the only area that can realy handle the stress exerted on it (perpendicular force would attempt to wrench the gun off the hull). And also, if the weapon was mounted say on the broadside or rear of the ship, a recoil effect might cause the leviathan to fishtail... but the force being exerted on the front of the craft would simply mean that the engines would have to make a thrust adjustment to bring the ship back in line... recoil in an odd direction would also make sense for why you can't fire them when burning retros, since you're already compensating for enough force there. |
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Ethereal
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Makes sense... after all, Burn Retros, Come to New Heading and All Ahead Full all involve complex maneuvers... and when you're trying to get something 5km long to all go in the same direction, the last thing you need is the prow to decide it wants to be 900m above where it is now, and heading in a totally different dirction.
__________________
Farewell, Kangaroo Joe, you shall not be forgotten. Quote:
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dread Auto cannon and Assault cannon? | Kalshinko | Space Marines | 11 | 14 Mar 2010 23:09 |
| nova cannon | thedestroyerofworlds | House Rules | 3 | 07 Dec 2008 14:59 |
| Nova Cannon Question | Nox | Other GW Games | 15 | 26 Mar 2008 00:59 |
| Nova Cannon Firepower Calculation | AuinMyrrath | 40K Universe | 42 | 10 Mar 2008 01:44 |